PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-55.26%
Negative revenue growth while SEDG stands at 29.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-139.07%
Negative gross profit growth while SEDG is at 65.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-91.94%
Negative EBIT growth while SEDG is at 7.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.85%
Negative operating income growth while SEDG is at 4.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-65.77%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 16.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while SEDG is at 16.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SEDG is at 16.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
149.04%
Slight or no buybacks while SEDG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
149.04%
Slight or no buyback while SEDG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.59%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 79.37%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
44.58%
FCF growth 50-75% of SEDG's 68.38%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-99.06%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-98.80%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-97.95%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
97.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 55.30%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
96.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-117.25%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-219.65%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-115.25%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-129.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-107.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 646.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
32.36%
Below 50% of SEDG's 164.64%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-129.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 64.28%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.90%
Firm’s AR is declining while SEDG shows 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.69%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-18.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
56.59%
Positive BV/share change while SEDG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.59%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
We cut SG&A while SEDG invests at 14.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.