PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.24%
Positive revenue growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-253.92%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-554.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-215.67%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-390.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-296.15%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-296.15%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-38.35%
Share reduction while SEDG is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-38.35%
Reduced diluted shares while SEDG is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-697.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-612.15%
Negative FCF growth while SEDG is at 17.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-98.55%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 102.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-97.80%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-96.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-15.34%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-12.63%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-107.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-523.77%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-882.15%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-111.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-117.92%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 7164.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.98%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 10.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-189.42%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.77%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-70.14%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
223.24%
Positive asset growth while SEDG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-151.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
191.33%
Debt growth far above SEDG's 4.02%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
We expand SG&A while SEDG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.