PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.89%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -0.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-32.38%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-64.37%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-67.05%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is -4.98%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-79.39%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-79.78%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-79.45%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.12%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.21%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.88%
OCF growth of 13.88% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-323.16%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
6445.22%
10Y CAGR of 6445.22% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
5.50%
5Y CAGR of 5.50% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-46.37%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
1256.12%
OCF/share CAGR of 1256.12% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-52.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-89.41%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
229.38%
Net income/share CAGR of 229.38% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-49.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-88.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.56%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-46.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.14%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-14.75%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.71%
Asset growth of 3.71% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.92%
BV/share growth of 3.92% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.30%
Debt growth of 0.30% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
13.88%
R&D growth of 13.88% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
20.40%
SG&A growth of 20.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.