PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.49%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 20.86%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
15.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.42%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
231.50%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 13.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
233.84%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 13.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
127.15%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 46.59%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
118.18%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 47.08%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
122.22%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 46.93%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
1.12%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
6.90%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.45%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
52.35%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 36.97%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute it to efficient operations or capital spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.55%
5Y CAGR of 2.55% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-29.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -23.81%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-212.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
106.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 37.25%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 8.53%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-11.49%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.73%
Receivables growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-14.97%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.00%
Asset growth of 2.00% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.08%
75-90% of Solar median. John Neff calls for higher ROE or more effective capital usage to match peers.
0.25%
Debt growth of 0.25% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.28%
R&D growth of 4.28% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-4.34%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.