PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.70%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
139.12%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.73%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
505.40%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.04%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
616.64%
Operating income growth of 616.64% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
320.55%
Net income growth of 320.55% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
329.17%
EPS growth of 329.17% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
315.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 315.00% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.14%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
-1.82%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.09%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
477.41%
OCF growth of 477.41% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
156.59%
FCF growth of 156.59% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
10938.99%
10Y CAGR of 10938.99% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
53.87%
5Y CAGR of 53.87% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
53.69%
3Y CAGR of 53.69% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
4077.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 4077.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-4.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-32.03%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
821.32%
Net income/share CAGR of 821.32% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
10067.98%
Net income/share CAGR of 10067.98% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
220.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-10.49%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.06%
AR growth of 22.06% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
6.77%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-1.43%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
10.92%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
7.10%
Debt growth of 7.10% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
31.43%
R&D growth of 31.43% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
8.93%
SG&A growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.