PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.35%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -7.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-38.74%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 14.97%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-444.62%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 31.16%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-279.01%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 22.42%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-817.67%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 8.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-825.00%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 4.97%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-825.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 3.95%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.17%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-0.56%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1062.88%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is -8.33%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-493.32%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is -12.01%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-52.73%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 26.27%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-9.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-5.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 6.19%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-155.15%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 7.21%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
53.48%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.21%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
27.20%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Solar median of 7.47%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
31.95%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
62.15%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 1.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-3593.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-63.50%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-15.41%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 11.48%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
5052.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 36.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.77%
Receivables growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
20.53%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-16.16%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-12.72%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-40.99%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
30.34%
R&D growth of 30.34% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
10.61%
Our SG&A slightly up while Solar is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.