PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-55.26%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-139.07%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 4.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-91.94%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-25.85%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-65.77%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 7.24%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 6.92%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
149.04%
Share change of 149.04% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
149.04%
Diluted share change of 149.04% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.59%
OCF growth of 45.59% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
44.58%
FCF growth of 44.58% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-99.06%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-98.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-97.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
97.84%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.43% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
96.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 96.13% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-117.25%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is -2.08%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-219.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 0.74%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-115.25%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-129.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -70.89%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-107.24%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
32.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 32.36% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-129.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.90%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-26.69%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-18.26%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
56.59%
Positive BV/share change while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-2.59%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.