PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1501.77%
Revenue growth of 1501.77% vs. zero growth in Solar. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
1407.19%
Gross profit growth of 1407.19% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
172.69%
EBIT growth of 172.69% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
28.26%
Operating income growth of 28.26% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
160.27%
Net income growth of 160.27% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
160.19%
EPS growth of 160.19% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
160.19%
Diluted EPS growth of 160.19% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.99%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 12.40%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-18.62%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 28.38%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-86.72%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 24.23%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-70.29%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-47.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-136.42%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-2146.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-2333.49%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 66.46%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-39.18%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of -0.15%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
1647.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
434.26%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 434.26% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-111.09%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 25.16%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-2041.68%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 31.97%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-157.67%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
511.98%
AR growth of 511.98% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
3542.50%
We have slight inventory growth while Solar is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we expect bigger future sales or if peers see a looming downturn.
33.84%
We expand assets while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
31.65%
Positive BV/share change while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-24.35%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.10%
SG&A growth of 134.10% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.