PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.05%
Revenue growth of 91.05% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
78.70%
Gross profit growth of 78.70% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-24.88%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-125.93%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-89.04%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-87.50%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-87.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
11.95%
Share change of 11.95% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
14.76%
Diluted share change of 14.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.06%
OCF growth of 77.06% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
23.51%
FCF growth of 23.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-39.08%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 41.80%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-39.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 44.90%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-39.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 18.96%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
97.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 97.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
97.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 97.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
97.40%
3Y OCF/share growth of 97.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
100.81%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 46.96% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
100.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
100.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 20.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.42%
AR growth of 102.42% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
221.47%
Inventory growth of 221.47% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
86.59%
Asset growth of 86.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
16.25%
BV/share growth of 16.25% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.51%
R&D growth of 14.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
266.44%
SG&A growth of 266.44% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.