PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-67.89%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 2.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-214.64%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 4.31%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
25.24%
EBIT growth 75-90% of Energy median of 31.72%. John Neff would demand margin improvements or operating leverage to catch up.
51.95%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 28.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
51.12%
Net income growth near Energy median of 51.17%. Charlie Munger would see common industry factors at play.
51.26%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 38.46%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if the company’s capital allocation strategy boosts these results.
51.26%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 37.47%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the gap to effective capital allocation.
0.33%
Share change of 0.33% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.33%
Diluted share change of 0.33% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.11%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-145.35%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -5.13%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
22.72%
10Y CAGR of 22.72% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-46.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -22.93%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-58.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -27.91%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-589.71%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
25.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 25.26% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-321.17%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-5856.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-45.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-281.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -16.29%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-30.93%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-46.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-36.42%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -5.71%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.67%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
6.59%
Inventory growth of 6.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-5.27%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.05%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
21.24%
Debt growth of 21.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-14.02%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.33%
SG&A growth of 1.33% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.