PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.60%
Revenue growth of 14.60% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-4711.83%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-274.31%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-256.54%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-285.53%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-281.93%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-281.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.51%
Share change of 0.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.51%
Diluted share change of 0.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.66%
OCF growth of 47.66% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
42.53%
FCF growth of 42.53% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-33.88%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-33.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -9.66%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.39%
3Y CAGR of 12.39% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-329.39%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-58.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
45.10%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 7.29%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-908.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-2061.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-6649.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 42.94%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-97.97%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-96.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -0.38%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-97.83%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -10.16%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.38%
AR growth of 3.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
3.89%
Inventory growth of 3.89% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-18.85%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-75.77%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-16.71%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
65.82%
R&D growth of 65.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.34%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.