PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.67%
Revenue growth of 6.67% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-177.61%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-80.71%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
33.93%
Operating income growth of 33.93% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-76.09%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-75.00%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.08%
Share change of 0.08% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.73%
OCF growth of 83.73% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
56.28%
FCF growth of 56.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-35.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-38.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -11.48%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
17.44%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-132.84%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-168.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
91.47%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 10.70%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-405.40%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 46.37%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-709.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 15.34%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-19.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 82.79%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-111.66%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-116.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -7.90%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-113.86%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -0.23%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.76%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-19.52%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-24.74%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-393.59%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-54.80%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.80%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-29.30%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.