PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.10%
Revenue growth of 5.10% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
15.31%
Gross profit growth of 15.31% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
44.28%
EBIT growth of 44.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
23.57%
Operating income growth of 23.57% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
42.88%
Net income growth of 42.88% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
34.48%
EPS growth of 34.48% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
34.48%
Diluted EPS growth of 34.48% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.29%
Share change of 0.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.29%
Diluted share change of 0.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.22%
OCF growth of 87.22% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.66%
FCF growth of 77.66% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-44.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-16.93%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.90%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
27.52%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Energy median of 43.79%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
81.97%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.16% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
88.61%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 16.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-181.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 38.78%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-210.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 71.96%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
94.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
-256.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 98.47%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-65.63%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
1001.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 1.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
1362.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 17.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.28%
AR growth of 2.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.05%
Inventory growth of 11.05% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.45%
Asset growth of 5.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-5.37%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
22.31%
Debt growth of 22.31% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-10.20%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-8.99%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.