PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.05%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 5.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-91.56%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 8.79%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-117.68%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 10.99%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
52.17%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 11.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-19.73%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 2.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
5.26%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
-2636.84%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 1.93%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.11%
Share change of 0.11% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.11%
Diluted share change of 0.11% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.64%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 4.01%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
37.43%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 11.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-54.63%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-19.07%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 12.09%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
52.14%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Energy median of 61.39%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
-148.30%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 7.29%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
89.98%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 29.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
55.23%
3Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if cost advantage or brand strength explains near-term outperformance.
-123.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 41.61%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
66.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Energy median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
-181.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 110.42%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-72.89%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
707.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
4083.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 25.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.69%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-23.48%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-8.03%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-11.43%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 1.27%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-9.91%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-16.93%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-79.07%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.