PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.13%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-56.88%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
64.12%
EBIT growth of 64.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-44.93%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
26.00%
Net income growth of 26.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-294.44%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
86.35%
Diluted EPS growth of 86.35% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.04%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.06%
Diluted share change of 0.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.92%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-89.21%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-61.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-37.05%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 5.46%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
1.50%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Energy median of 32.86%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
-159.44%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 18.98%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
13.70%
5Y OCF/share growth 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier would worry about a persistent shortfall vs. peers.
-281.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 60.92%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-185.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 61.06%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
85.92%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 45.67%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-106.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 80.83%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-81.01%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
218.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-26.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 18.56%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.64%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-19.39%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-6.93%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-27.56%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.38%
Debt growth of 4.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-11.23%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
8.26%
SG&A growth of 8.26% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.