PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.69%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.73%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 1.41%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-71.58%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 12.59%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
104.85%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-82.70%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 11.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-83.87%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 10.50%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-99.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 10.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
6.32%
Share change of 6.32% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
115.49%
Diluted share change of 115.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.72%
Positive OCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
89.76%
Positive FCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-69.07%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 11.83%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-61.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 39.03%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-48.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
96.18%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 11.00% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
96.92%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 52.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
94.77%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 7.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
239.80%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 95.89% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1296.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 102.46%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
153.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-109.80%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-2088.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 30.75%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-153.70%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 29.33%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.40%
AR growth of 28.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-50.20%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.32%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
14.20%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-7.07%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.