PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.21%
Similar revenue growth to CSIQ's 19.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
216.39%
Cost growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 28.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-72.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.94%
R&D growth less than half of CSIQ's 26.28%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while CSIQ shows 283.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.83%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CSIQ's 167.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.98%
Total costs growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 39.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
1.40%
Interest expense growth less than half of CSIQ's 11.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.35%
D&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 2612.96%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-34.98%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-601.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-76.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-95.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.57%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-115.69%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.25%
Share count change of 0.25% while CSIQ is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while CSIQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.