PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.56%
Positive growth while CSIQ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.17%
Cost increase while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-41.96%
Gross profit decline while CSIQ shows 104.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-44.49%
Margin decline while CSIQ shows 126.16% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.15%
R&D growth while CSIQ reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
46.11%
G&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 359.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.17%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CSIQ's 154.63%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.84%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x CSIQ's 7.17%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-21.87%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.31%
D&A reduction while CSIQ shows 470.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2175.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2085.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-195.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-181.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-169.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1468.30%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-198.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-185.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-197.56%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-197.56%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while CSIQ shows 0.95% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.