PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while CSIQ shows 5.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
9.40%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x CSIQ's 7.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-32.38%
Gross profit decline while CSIQ shows 1.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.88%
R&D growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 8.96%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
20.40%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x CSIQ's 17.11%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.48%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 24.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
10.93%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x CSIQ's 8.85%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-3.07%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 650.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-53.56%
EBITDA decline while CSIQ shows 1.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.68%
Other expenses growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-86.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-85.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
296.39%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.78%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.45%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 6.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while CSIQ shows 7.57% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.