1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-40.45%
Revenue decline while CSIQ shows 28.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-42.80%
Cost reduction while CSIQ shows 43.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
144.12%
Positive growth while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
174.10%
Margin expansion while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.70%
R&D reduction while CSIQ shows 10.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-10.20%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.02%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-33.09%
Total costs reduction while CSIQ shows 37.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.57%
Interest expense growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-27.78%
D&A reduction while CSIQ shows 12.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
88.39%
EBITDA growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.51%
EBITDA margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.76%
Operating income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.36%
Operating margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.71%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 0.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
80.98%
Pre-tax income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.06%
Pre-tax margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
191.57%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
79.61%
Net income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.75%
Net margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.66%
EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.61%
Diluted EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.49%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.