PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Positive growth while CSIQ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
97.07%
Cost increase while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-4711.83%
Gross profit decline while CSIQ shows 10.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4124.34%
Margin decline while CSIQ shows 142.59% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
65.82%
R&D growth while CSIQ reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-0.63%
G&A reduction while CSIQ shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CSIQ's 60.58%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
76.43%
Total costs growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.42%
Interest expense growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.18%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-513.61%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-435.45%
EBITDA margin decline while CSIQ shows 59.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-256.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-211.12%
Operating margin decline while CSIQ shows 50.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
220.35%
Other expenses growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-227.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-185.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.24%
Tax expense growth less than half of CSIQ's 89.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-285.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-236.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.47%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.51%
Diluted share increase while CSIQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.