PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-55.26%
Revenue decline while CSIQ shows 23.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-30.59%
Cost reduction while CSIQ shows 25.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-139.07%
Gross profit decline while CSIQ shows 11.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-187.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.64%
G&A growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 6.57%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-50.23%
Marketing expense reduction while CSIQ shows 48.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
Operating expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 7.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.46%
Total costs reduction while CSIQ shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.87%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.84%
D&A reduction while CSIQ shows 10.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-98.23%
EBITDA decline while CSIQ shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-343.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.85%
Operating income decline while CSIQ shows 34.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-181.28%
Operating margin decline while CSIQ shows 9.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.54%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-44.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-223.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
900.00%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-65.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-270.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
149.04%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
149.04%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.