PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.24%
Positive growth while CSIQ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
61.46%
Cost increase while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-253.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-187.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.39%
G&A growth while CSIQ reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
254.97%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 3.40%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 5.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
153.87%
Total costs growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.60%
Interest expense growth less than half of CSIQ's 3.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-571.02%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-444.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-215.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-994.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-461.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-355.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-390.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-297.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-296.15%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-296.15%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-38.35%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.