PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.21%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
216.39%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 4.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-72.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.94%
R&D growth while ENPH reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
24.83%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.98%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.40%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.35%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-34.98%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.37%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 26.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.83%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 23.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-601.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-76.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-95.09%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 24.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-95.81%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 22.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.57%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.69%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.