PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.64%
Positive growth while ENPH shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
380.05%
Cost increase while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-69.23%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 36.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-72.19%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 46.88% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.68%
R&D growth less than half of ENPH's 15.58%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
29.35%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x ENPH's 26.21%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
352.36%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 49.59%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
19.94%
Similar operating expenses growth to ENPH's 24.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
10.21%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
76.51%
Interest expense growth less than half of ENPH's 276.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.02%
Similar D&A growth to ENPH's 23.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
354.99%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
311.22%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.20%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.86%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
276.34%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
244.02%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
230.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.20%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 27.69%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-149.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-144.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.43%
Share count change of 0.43% while ENPH is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.94%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.