PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
43.31%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ENPH's 73.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
47.80%
Cost growth 50-75% of ENPH's 75.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
28.15%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ENPH's 56.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.42%
Similar R&D growth to ENPH's 25.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-5.61%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 36.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
69.36%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 52.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.54%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ENPH's 34.24%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
40.54%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ENPH's 60.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-23.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.76%
D&A growth less than half of ENPH's 20.06%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-20.33%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.41%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 25.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
573.02%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
430.07%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 26.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-75.73%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 17.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 27.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-107.18%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 25.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
423.62%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
325.82%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 27.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
423.08%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
423.08%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.29%
Share count change of 0.29% while ENPH is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
10.55%
Diluted share change of 10.55% while ENPH is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.