PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
70.18%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 10.30%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
59.65%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 10.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
111.14%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 7.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.07%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.33%
R&D growth less than half of ENPH's 11.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
173.32%
G&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 4.16%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-172.10%
Marketing expense reduction while ENPH shows 26.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.95%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 13.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
47.79%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-30.54%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.72%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 8.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
197.89%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.04%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1553.08%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
871.39%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
184.89%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
880.84%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
476.36%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
214.99%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 15.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
656.87%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
344.75%
Net margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
580.95%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
580.95%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.19%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.05%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.