PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.59%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ENPH's 30.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
16.38%
Cost growth 50-75% of ENPH's 26.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
62.44%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 46.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
34.70%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 11.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-15.68%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 10.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-18.00%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 6.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ENPH shows 25.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.58%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 13.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.67%
Similar total costs growth to ENPH's 21.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.74%
Interest expense growth less than half of ENPH's 130.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.42%
D&A growth less than half of ENPH's 25.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-21.27%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 21.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.56%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 30.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Operating income growth below 50% of ENPH's 19.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 38.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-26.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.24%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of ENPH's 15.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
681.19%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 132.31%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-12.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.34%
Net margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 14.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.97%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 95.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.97%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 95.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.99%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 2213.07%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
5.99%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 2213.07%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.