PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.51%
Positive growth while ENPH shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.33%
Cost increase while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
24.75%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.97%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.33%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2.89%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 7.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.60%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 5.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.93%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.96%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.21%
D&A growth less than half of ENPH's 2.74%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
55.98%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.75%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.76%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.57%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.95%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of ENPH's 56.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
387.92%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
349.66%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.59%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
191.18%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
168.35%
Net margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
194.44%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
180.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.60%
Share count reduction below 50% of ENPH's 0.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ENPH's 0.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.