PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.65%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 42.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.85%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 41.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-42.24%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 43.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.25%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 0.99% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.99%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 22.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-3.29%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 17.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.86%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 19.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.08%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 33.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.75%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 8.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.30%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-67.86%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 87.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.18%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 91.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.68%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 56.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.29%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 69.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.21%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-116.29%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 52.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-122.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 66.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-159.97%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 5.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-78.32%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 51.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.44%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 65.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.25%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 52.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.57%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 52.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.18%
Share count reduction below 50% of ENPH's 1.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-2.56%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 1.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.