PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
75.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 6.15%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
63.25%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 5.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
139.12%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 7.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.12%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
31.43%
R&D growth above 1.5x ENPH's 7.66%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
8.93%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.22%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ENPH's 8.02%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
58.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 6.21%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.40%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 60.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.88%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 7.28%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
290.51%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 10.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
122.29%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 16.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
616.64%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 3.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
307.94%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1706.24%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
928.19%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
239.76%
Similar tax expense growth to ENPH's 226.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
320.55%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
139.40%
Net margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
329.17%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
315.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.14%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.12%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.82%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 0.45% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.