PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-40.45%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-42.80%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
144.12%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
174.10%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 9.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.70%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-10.20%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 16.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.02%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 8.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-33.09%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.57%
Interest expense growth less than half of ENPH's 17.12%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-27.78%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
88.39%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.51%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.76%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.36%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.71%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
80.98%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.06%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
191.57%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 124.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
79.61%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.75%
Net margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.66%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.61%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.49%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 6.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 6.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.