PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 8.47%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
97.07%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-4711.83%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 23.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4124.34%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 14.27% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
65.82%
R&D growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.17%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.63%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 0.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x ENPH's 11.88%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
76.43%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 5.53%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.42%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.18%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-513.61%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 427.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-435.45%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 401.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-256.54%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 77.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-211.12%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 79.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
220.35%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-227.22%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 30.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-185.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 35.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.24%
Tax expense growth less than half of ENPH's 44.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-285.53%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 27.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-236.42%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 32.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-281.93%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 28.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-281.93%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 31.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.51%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 2.22%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.51%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 6.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.