PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.38%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ENPH's 48.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
12.20%
Cost growth less than half of ENPH's 71.09%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
102.35%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 28.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
62.68%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-38.72%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 4.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
48.07%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.34%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.79%
Total costs growth less than half of ENPH's 46.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.79%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-78.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.89%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 46.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1259.49%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 52.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1032.20%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 3.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
174.48%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
194.72%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 59.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.95%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 7.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-48.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
824.29%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 85.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
643.11%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 24.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
830.77%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 83.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 78.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 0.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.81%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 2.94%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.