PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.27%
Similar revenue growth to ENPH's 20.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
20.98%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x ENPH's 17.73%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
12.71%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ENPH's 23.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-5.50%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 3.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
47.80%
R&D growth above 1.5x ENPH's 9.90%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.09%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ENPH's 8.53%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
21.23%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 14.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
27.90%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
159.91%
D&A growth while ENPH reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-185.68%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 44.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-139.53%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 17.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.19%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 52.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.47%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 26.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-366.81%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 58.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-172.02%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 60.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-128.07%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 33.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
133.47%
Similar tax expense growth to ENPH's 172.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-91.84%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 48.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.85%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 23.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.47%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 45.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.47%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.33%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.50%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.33%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.