PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth below 50% of ENPH's 14.17%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.05%
Cost growth less than half of ENPH's 12.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.76%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 15.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.07%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 1.58% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.04%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 12.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.13%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 15.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.40%
Total costs growth less than half of ENPH's 13.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
70.85%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.06%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
41.05%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x ENPH's 33.84%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-86.01%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 25.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.62%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 5.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
76.66%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 15.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
68.99%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-108.59%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 1045.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-96.25%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 9.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-191.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-94.39%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 33.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.63%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 17.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.87%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 41.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 34.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.82%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.