PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-97.19%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-97.76%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-15.10%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2918.10%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-94.65%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 5.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-50.74%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.66%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-96.14%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-30.89%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-97.69%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
67.27%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1063.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
53.01%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1570.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
69.57%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
57.89%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1396.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
105.26%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of ENPH's 152.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
65.32%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1132.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
71.83%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.83%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-71.98%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-72.01%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.