PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.48%
Growth of 19.48% while FSLR shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
15.99%
Cost growth of 15.99% while FSLR maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
32.65%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.02%
Margin expansion while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.01%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.44%
Operating expenses change of 15.44% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.91%
Total costs change of 15.91% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
D&A change of 1.07% while FSLR maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
28.59%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.63%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.29%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.18%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.93%
Similar other expenses growth to FSLR's 97.83%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
79.43%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 4.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.18%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 4.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.94%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
77.71%
Income change of 77.71% while FSLR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
48.74%
Margin change of 48.74% while FSLR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
75.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 4.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
62.50%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 7.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.66%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 4.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.47%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 7.81%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.