PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.67%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
57.81%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSLR's 3.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
56.16%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.39%
R&D growth 50-75% of FSLR's 29.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
6.07%
G&A change of 6.07% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 61.49%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.08%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.01%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.35%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.62%
D&A growth less than half of FSLR's 15.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
634.58%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
368.88%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
482.57%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
344.19%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-93.32%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 179.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.82%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
272.18%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.18%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.15%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.18%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-2.13%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.