PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.64%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 3.50%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
380.05%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSLR's 6.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-69.23%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 0.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-72.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.68%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
29.35%
G&A change of 29.35% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
352.36%
Marketing expense change of 352.36% while FSLR maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 100.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
19.94%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 14.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
10.21%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 8.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
76.51%
Interest expense change of 76.51% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
23.02%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
354.99%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
311.22%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.20%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.86%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
276.34%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
244.02%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
230.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.20%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-149.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-144.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.43%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.94%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.