PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
43.31%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 35.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
47.80%
Similar cost growth to FSLR's 56.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
28.15%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 13.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-10.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.42%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-5.61%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
69.36%
Marketing expense change of 69.36% while FSLR maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.54%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 6.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
40.54%
Similar total costs growth to FSLR's 43.91%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-23.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.76%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.33%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 13.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
573.02%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 17.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
430.07%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-75.73%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 3748.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.82%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 18.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.18%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 68.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
423.62%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 11.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
325.82%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
423.08%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 11.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
423.08%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 10.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.29%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.55%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.