PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
70.18%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
59.65%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
111.14%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
24.07%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 20.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
5.33%
R&D growth less than half of FSLR's 28.54%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
173.32%
G&A change of 173.32% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-172.10%
Marketing expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.95%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 18.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
47.79%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.54%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.72%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
197.89%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.04%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 29.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1553.08%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
871.39%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 2.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
184.89%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 504.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
880.84%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
476.36%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 6.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
214.99%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
656.87%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
344.75%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 15.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
580.95%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
580.95%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.19%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.05%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.