PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
31.20%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
57.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSLR's 9.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-78.20%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.79%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 5.59%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
35.92%
G&A change of 35.92% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.13%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSLR's 6.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.24%
Interest expense change of 5.24% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
6.33%
D&A growth less than half of FSLR's 16.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-422.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-346.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7584.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5756.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.65%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 104.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-398.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-280.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
243.54%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6871.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5213.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6763.64%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6763.64%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.98%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.25%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.