PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.90%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.76%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.90%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.91%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSLR's 11.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.04%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
11.58%
G&A change of 11.58% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.56%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 26.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.81%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.16%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
118.55%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.03%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-46.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
206.33%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x FSLR's 186.18%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
35.01%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.32%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-94.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
42.34%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.05%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.25%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.25%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.