PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSLR's 28.11%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
11.17%
Cost growth less than half of FSLR's 30.15%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-41.96%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 22.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-44.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18.15%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
46.11%
G&A change of 46.11% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.17%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.84%
Total costs growth less than half of FSLR's 24.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-21.87%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2175.47%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 31.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2085.00%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 16.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.69%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 60.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.08%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 25.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-195.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-181.78%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 54.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-169.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 20.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1468.30%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-198.26%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 75.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-185.26%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 36.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.56%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 75.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.56%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 74.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while FSLR shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 0.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.