1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.21%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 41.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.40%
Cost growth less than half of FSLR's 7.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-11.62%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 194.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.43%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 107.60% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
21.46%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.50%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.87%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.52%
Total costs growth 50-75% of FSLR's 4.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.28%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 114.89%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.83%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5686.01%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 276.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5697.79%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 353.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.04%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 596.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.32%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 390.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-271.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-115.91%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 568.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 371.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5596.81%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSLR's 248.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-965.36%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 266.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-967.18%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 158.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-920.00%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 264.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1125.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 263.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.56%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-13.07%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.68% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.