PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-40.45%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 67.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-42.80%
Cost reduction while FSLR shows 42.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
144.12%
Similar gross profit growth to FSLR's 178.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
174.10%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 66.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.70%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-10.20%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.02%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-33.09%
Total costs reduction while FSLR shows 31.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.57%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-27.78%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
88.39%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSLR's 21213.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
80.51%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 350.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
81.76%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 311.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.36%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 226.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
45.71%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 755.66%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
80.98%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSLR's 396.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
68.06%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 277.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
191.57%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
79.61%
Net income growth 50-75% of FSLR's 119.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
65.75%
Net margin growth 50-75% of FSLR's 111.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
79.66%
EPS growth 50-75% of FSLR's 119.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
79.61%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of FSLR's 118.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.49%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 1.78%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.