PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
97.07%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-4711.83%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4124.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
65.82%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.63%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
76.43%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.42%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 17.04%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.18%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 24.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-513.61%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-435.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-256.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-211.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
220.35%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-227.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-185.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.24%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-285.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-236.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.51%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.