PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.09%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.70%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
143.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 79.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.38%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 91.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-11.33%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 2.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
4.45%
G&A change of 4.45% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 13.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.40%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-45.63%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-32.11%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 2.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-93.30%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 123.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.86%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 10720.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.88%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 581.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.39%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 614.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.14%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 128.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-110.21%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 779.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 827.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.75%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 28.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-112.36%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 265.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.33%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 276.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.94%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 261.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.67%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 261.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 2.28%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-14.56%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.81% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.