PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.85%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSLR's 155.92%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
18.92%
Cost growth less than half of FSLR's 160.95%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
97.18%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of FSLR's 141.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
55.44%
Margin expansion while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.42%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 2.07%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
9.49%
G&A change of 9.49% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.27%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.54%
Total costs growth less than half of FSLR's 128.34%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.26%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.05%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 8.51%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
418.55%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
308.78%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 119.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.53%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
103.57%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
152.47%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 545.34%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
268.89%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
220.63%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
136.23%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
128.56%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.36%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
127.27%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.93%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.44%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.